|
Personal Training Assessments - The Truth About
Fitness Assessments
Okay
folks, time for another Fit Rebel rant. This time I'm taking aim
at that time honored practice known as the personal training assessment.
As a trainer, I've done more than my share of these
things and I still do them for sure, but over time I've come to
see them in a very different light than I once did.
First off, is the notion of the free assessment as
an incentive. We trainers love to put out the free assessment as
a proverbial carrot for signing up for a gym membership or personal
training package.
I laugh now when I think of how much I did this. It's
funny to imagine there were mobs of people just dreaming of the
day when they could get poked, prodded and assessed on their fitness
level.
I remember back in grade school when we all used to
do fitness assessments and everyone, even I, hated doing them. I
have yet to meet someone who honestly really wants a fitness assessment.
It's kind of hard to offer it as an incentive when it's not exactly
at the top of every one's wish list.
Then we have the whole question of what's being assessed.
In the early days, I used to follow the same standard assessment
that was done for everyone at that gym. First came the medical questions.
(No joke there, it's still very important to ask such questions
and it's the only part of the whole deal I haven't changed.)
Then
came the push-up test, the sit-up test, the cardio test and on and
on and on.
Over time I realized that much of the test was kind
of frivolous. I once had a marathon runner who wanted to improve
his 5k time. So why the heck did we do the classic step test to
measure his cardiovascular endurance? He was a state champion marathon
runner for heaven's sake. What on earth could we possibly learn
from having him step up and down at 120 BPM for four minutes?
"Hey congrats, your cardio level is pretty good!"
Thank you Captain Obvious!
Plus, there's the whole relevance of the test to their
goals. If we really wanted to do a test we should have been testing
what we want to see change, which is his 5K time. Which of course
he already knew.
I also once had a basketball player who wanted a higher
vertical leap. So why should we test how many sit-ups he can do
when that's the last thing on his mind?
Finally we have to question the whole need to assess
something in the first place.
I used to use the assessment as a way to gage one's
fitness level so we knew what to work on and improve. I soon learned
this makes as much sense as doing a hunger assessment when walking
into a restaurant. The individual is already in the gym and coming
to the trainer with the desire to change something, and I'm willing
to bet they already have an idea of what they would like to change.
Do they really need a test to figure out they lack upper body strength
when it's been something they want to improve upon for years?
And then we have the classic idea that we need an
assessment so we can track and measure progress to know that a change
has occurred.
I'm sorry, but changing the human body should be like
falling down a flight of stairs - you always know when it happens.
Unless you're really looking for fine-tuning (like going from 8%
body fat to 6%), the changes shouldn't require a costly and lengthy
test to know they are happening. They should be blatantly obvious.
These days, my assessments are very different than
they used to be. First, I encourage the client to get a medical
screening by their family doctor since their doctor is far more
thorough and capable than I will ever be at such a thing. Then we
quickly test the fitness characteristics that the client feels are
relevant and important to know. This is quick and to the point,
taking about 20-30 minutes. If they don't want to be tested for
body fat or flexibility, I see no reason to push the issue.
Then, once we have a plan for what we want to accomplish
and set a few goals, it's down to the training itself and making
those goals a reality.
I figure that's what they might have been wanting
all along.
By Matt
Schifferle
|