| Author |
Message |
swanso5
Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 6891
Location: melbourne, australia
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| well just go back to your regular training then which isn't delivering results either... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick
Joined: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 71
Location: St Johns
|
| Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah i have a few concerns too for budybuilders like ronnie coleman and jay cutler you know the really big guys who compete they dont workout like this they isolate bodyparts so whats the positives and negatives for the waterbury method vs the isolation ones?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swanso5
Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 6891
Location: melbourne, australia
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
if you took the amount of drugs they were you'd be that big too...
the old b'ber's from the 50's and 60's who look better than the one's today trained with full body workouts before steroids were made
that's evidence enough...also look at any athlete from any sport (excpet runner's) and tell me they are weak and look like crap |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Christopheel
Joined: 02 Jul 2007
Posts: 931
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 3:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| swanso5 wrote: | if you took the amount of drugs they were you'd be that big too...
the old b'ber's from the 50's and 60's who look better than the one's today trained with full body workouts before steroids were made
that's evidence enough...also look at any athlete from any sport (excpet runner's) and tell me they are weak and look like crap |
Not sure, even with that amount of drug, I don't have the genetics to go that far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swanso5
Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Posts: 6891
Location: melbourne, australia
|
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| well you donlt genetics with drugs, that's the point |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Log in
Register
Search
Profile
