| Author |
Message |
com34x

Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:53 am Post subject: Question about my workout schedule |
|
|
I am set up as 4 days a week.
Monday:
Biceps and Triceps
Wed:
Chest and Back
Friday:
Shoulders
Sunday:
Legs
Anything wrong with splitting the muscle groups up like this? I don't do compound because I have some weak spots that I have to be careful of and just dont have the room or equipment for it. I also figure, that I wont burn as many calories if I break up the muscle groups. That and I would get sufficient rest in between workouts.
Please don't mention Waterbury Method because I can care less about that. If I try to use a weight I can only lift 3 times, then I will hurt myself. I am doing my own thing as far as Set and Reps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DianaB

Joined: 05 Jul 2007 Posts: 714
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand what you mean by not doing compounds because of weak spots, please give me an example.
Compound lifts involve more than one joint, more muscle worked=more effort and calories burned. Do 10 curls and then 10 squat thrusters and tell me which required more effort.
You will only hurt yourself by lifting a weight that is inappropriate for your ability. This goes for any reps/set scheme. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
com34x

Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have a weak left chest from a collapsed lung operation that I had done a while back. I also have a weaker lower abdominal area that may have a small hernia or some sort of weak muscle. So this is why I say I can't go doing anything that can easily strain one of these areas. I can't choose a weight that I can only lift a few times because it would be too heavy. That and I don't always have a spotter.
I may be wrong about not doing compound exercises though. I think some of the exercises I am doing are actually compound and didn't know it. Dumbell chest presses? Seated Dumbell Deltoid presses, Squats to name a few.
I workout from home and all I have is an adjustable flat bench, with dumbells, some plates and a curl bar. I don't have the room for any kind of barbell exercises.
So back to what I was asking, would a workout plan split up this way be good enough? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swanso5

Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 7328
Location: melbourne, australia
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[/quote] So back to what I was asking, would a workout plan split up this way be good enough? | Quote: |
good enough for what???
doing your own sets and reps?? what does that mean
WM doesn't ask you to lift a wt you can 3 times anyway... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
com34x

Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
So back to what I was asking, would a workout plan split up this way be good enough? | Quote: |
good enough for what???
doing your own sets and reps?? what does that mean
WM doesn't ask you to lift a wt you can 3 times anyway... | [/quote]
Swanso,
Good enough for muscle gain.
I mean sticking to my own system of how much weight, sets, and reps not following someone in particular's method. Pretty much I mean doing what feels best.
Doesn't WM say to do 10 X3? So isn't that 10 sets of 3? I thought doing that sorta thing was for strength increase only not mass. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HOUSTON TEXAN

Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Posts: 715
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| By increasing strength you increase mass. Look at powerlifters for evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swanso5

Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 7328
Location: melbourne, australia
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 4:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
3 sets of 10 = 30 total reps
10 x 3 = 30 reps
same total reps...so what's the diference?
you'll be using 85% of your 1RM for the 10 x 3 compared to the 60% for the 3 x 10 so you get the same mass gains and the strength gains
win / win really |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
com34x

Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| swanso5 wrote: | 3 sets of 10 = 30 total reps
10 x 3 = 30 reps
same total reps...so what's the diference?
you'll be using 85% of your 1RM for the 10 x 3 compared to the 60% for the 3 x 10 so you get the same mass gains and the strength gains
win / win really |
Yes it is the same rep count, but you will be lifting heavier weights for 30 reps. Wouldn't 10X3 be a harder workout, and give better results? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
katiesuarez

Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 366
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CW also stated he doesn't care much for splits because most people who design their own program hit a muscle group only once every seven to ten days. He wrote that for optimum growth, you should hit the muscle group three times per week. Work them only twice per week for maintenance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swanso5

Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 7328
Location: melbourne, australia
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| that's what we're trying to tell you i beleive |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
com34x

Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I could still change my routine, I'm just afraid of over training or starting too quick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swanso5

Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 7328
Location: melbourne, australia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| youngsters like you don't overtrain, your nervous system isn't efficicent enough...lift, eat then sleep...that's about all you'll need to do |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|