| Author |
Message |
caden0925

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caden0925

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| anybody? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boss Man

Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 3771
Location: My site, (Steelmuscle), and anywhere else I feel like
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well I'm not too in the know with Elipticals, don't use them, but for the flexability and adaptability you obviously get with running workouts, I'd say running would. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caden0925

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm idk what to think. Some sites say running and most say elliptical. But the site you said on that one post
calorie-count.com said elliptical - moderate which is wat i do burns 714 calories in 70 minutes and running burns 572 in 70 minutes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boss Man

Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 3771
Location: My site, (Steelmuscle), and anywhere else I feel like
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well why the need to burn 700 at once. Seems a bit extreme to me, unless you're training for something like a Marathon, Tri-athlon etc etc.
You can increase running calorie burn anyway, by finding steeper terrain, increasign your pace, running with a weighted back-pack on etc etc.
P.S. depending on when people come on here, and who it is, sometimes queires get left unanswered for longer than 3 hours, sometimes less, so don't worry too much if that happens, it's not people not caring, it's just the way most messageboards work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
caden0925

Joined: 06 Mar 2007 Posts: 36
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah.. anyways thanks for the help =]]
I appreciate it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swanso5

Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 7315
Location: melbourne, australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| i would say running as your moving your own bodyweight where on the elliptical you don't...also if looking for calorie use per mode of exercise you should really look at TOTAL calories burnt not just what's burnt when actually doing it...cardio like that will burn more caloreis per hour but a solid wts session will burn more overall from raised metabolism as well as sprints and interval work |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sameey70

Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 247
Location: Atlanta, Ga
|
Posted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any activity that causes a calorie deficit will promote fat loss, no matter the machine. The calories burned depends on the intensity and duration of the activity. Elliptical work can be very challenging if you set the resistance high enough. I suggest not focusing on the machine itself, but the quality of your workout. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
alaL

Joined: 02 Jun 2007 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| skipping using a jumping rope, is it a cardio exercise? can this burn fats? calories? or carbs? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Boss Man

Joined: 25 Nov 2006 Posts: 3771
Location: My site, (Steelmuscle), and anywhere else I feel like
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|