Creatine

A forum for anything related to nutritional supplementation.

Moderators: cassiegose, Boss Man

Creatine

Postby Doomsday » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:07 am

which is better creatine monohydrate or ethyl esther??

and what creatine product has shown the best results?? for whoever takes creatine
Doomsday
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:14 pm
Location: Hollywood,California

Re: Creatine

Postby Boss Man » Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:36 pm

Ethyl Esther is supposed to be better, as it alledgedly cause no water retention, requires no loading and can be cycled continuously.

Cycling it continuously is not a good thing in my mind you should still do either a 2-3 months on 1 off, or minimum a 3 weeks on 1 off cycle.

There was reports not long after Ethyl Esther came out, supposedly saying it was not 100% safe, and couldn't bypass gut enzymes, which could strip off the Esther bond and leave you with a fancy type of Monohydrate.

The claims were supposedly rumours put out by a Kre-alkalyn manufacturer, as Kre came out about a year prior to E E, however I never saw anything to support this, so read into that what you will.

Rssults wise, something that has less water retention, should theoretically perform a little better, because you don't have any retained water weight affecting power to weight ratio.
Boss Man
 
Posts: 6177
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:27 pm
Location: N/A,United Kingdom


Return to Nutritional Supplements

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests